Convention of the states update.
sparkling water
|
Posted 12:57 pm, 05/01/2015
|
There are two Americas according to many democrats. You want to save one. Many folk want to save the other.
|
youlie
|
Posted 12:49 pm, 05/01/2015
|
Anyone who loves America, don't.just say "no" to this dangerous convention idea, say "hail no "
|
skeptic
|
Posted 12:01 pm, 05/01/2015
|
But back to my first post today. I think Hillary gives us a much better chance than a conservative.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 11:25 am, 05/01/2015
|
Now go back to playing with your gruber.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 11:24 am, 05/01/2015
|
I never said that the federal system had control of how states are structured, you pompous idiot. I'd just like to see the ideas mirrored on the NC state level.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 11:17 am, 05/01/2015
|
1.) I GUESS THAT IS WHY SO MANY PRESIDENTS IN THEIR SECOND TERM ARE NOT AS SUCESSFUL AS THEIR FIRST FOUR YEARS.
2) POLITICAL REALITIES ARE NO DIFFERENT TODAY.
3) WE LONG AS THERE ARE POLITICAL PARTIES, THERE WILL BE GERRYMANDERING.
5 & 6) A FEDERALLY CALLED CONVENTION HAS NO CONTROL OVER INDIVIDUAL STATES.
I GUESS YOUR *** IS TOILET PAPER.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 11:05 am, 05/01/2015
|
You couldn't tear up used toilet paper.
1) Being a lame duck is no issue. If a person can't lead in the space of six years they weren't a leader. Clinton didn't let lame duck status affect him. If lame duck status is so bad, why the **** do any presidents seek that second term. 2) Try it again. The political realities are different today. The president has no need of a "mini me" that he ignores for most of his term. 3) Fix the gerrymandering. Don't use it as an excuse for your fear of change. 4) Thank you. 5) and 6) I can address state issues if I like. Not my fault that your brain is too inflexible to encompass other concepts.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 11:01 am, 05/01/2015
|
YOU'RE JUST PISSED BECAUSE I'VE PROVEN YOU TO BE A LIAR ON HERE MANY TIMES AND YOU CAN'T STAND IT.
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 10:58 am, 05/01/2015
|
Atta-boy there, umps. Most everyone else on here exchanges in polite discussion and the mighty umps looks at it as "TEAR YOUR *** UP NOW". Crude, Lewd and way past overdone. umps goes by the adage that opinions are like rectums, everybody has one and they all stink but his!
|
Umpire
|
Posted 10:50 am, 05/01/2015
|
OK. LETS TEAR YOUR *** UP NOW.
ITEM 1) IF ELECTED TO ONLY ONE TERM FOR SIX YEARS HE WOULD BE CONSIDERED A LAME DUCK FROM HIS INAUGURATION ONWARD.
ITEM 2) ELECTED SEPERATE. TRIED THAT BEFORE, DIDN'T WORK.
ITEM 3) GERRYMANDERING MAKES THIS A NO STARTER FROM THE START.
ITEM 4) WORKABLE.
ITEMS 5 & 6) THOSE ARE STATE ISSUES. YOU IDIOTS ARE ALWAYS TAKING ABOUT STATE RIGHTS BUT YOU WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER. PRICELESS!!
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 10:37 am, 05/01/2015
|
Is support a form.of term.limits: Non consecutive 6 year terms for President. She/he can run again after sitting out a term. The president has too much to do to spend all that time campaigning. President and VP elected separately.
Electoral college could based on congressional districts rather than states.
House and Senate members serve not more than two consecutive terms. Might as well have house members serve four year terms and save the costs of elections.
Same rules for Governor and Lt Gov as for Pres and VP.
NC council of state should be nominated by the Governor and confirmed by the State Senate.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 9:55 am, 05/01/2015
|
NO IT DOESN'T.
THE CONSTITUTION IS VERY CLEAR ON THE ISSUE.
|
skeptic
|
Posted 9:34 am, 05/01/2015
|
It needs clarification. We can't keep bringing in foreign workers.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 9:05 am, 05/01/2015
|
LET'S START OFF WITH ITEM #4 IN YOUR LIST SINCE IT IS THE EASIEST.
THAT ISSUE IS ALREADY COVERED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 SUBSECTION 4.
|
skeptic
|
Posted 8:55 am, 05/01/2015
|
There is several I could support.
1. Term limits for all federal positions. We have a large pool of qualified people in this country.
2. Balanced budget amendment. Within a period of time as to not crash our economy.
3. Foreign aid can be no more than 2% of our budget. That would include aid distributed thru the military.
4.Legal immigration can only occur if our unemployment is less than 5%.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 8:33 am, 05/01/2015
|
WELL, WHAT CHANGES DO YOU PROPOSE?
|
skeptic
|
Posted 8:20 am, 05/01/2015
|
If we basically have four more years of the same then the convention will not lose momentum. Where as if we get Rand Paul I think we lose momentum in the movement.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 8:07 am, 05/01/2015
|
WHY WOULD THE ELECTION OF HILLARY GUARANTEE A CONVENTION?
YOU TEA PARTY NUTCASES THINK YOU CAN OVERTURN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION THAT WAY?
|
skeptic
|
Posted 8:01 am, 05/01/2015
|
Just vote for Hillary. Then we get it for sure. I think the convention could do a lot more to fix our country than a conservative president.
|
|
|